Chij Primary Toa Payoh

628 Lorong 1 Toa Payoh , 319765

63532164

At a glance

CHIJ Primary (Toa Payoh) is a popular choice among Singaporean parents, with a competitive application rate of 131% from 277 applications for 211 placements. This all-girls primary school has a rich history and a strong reputation for academic brilliance.

School Type
Government-aided Sch
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Toa Payoh
Latest Ballot Year
2024
Government-aided Sch Girls' School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Toa Payoh
Principal

MADAM CHUA SOOK LIAN JUDINA

Vice Principals

MRS SNG CHARMAINE, MRS MELISSA YAP

Website

http://www.chijpritoapayoh.moe.edu.sg

Email

chijtpps@moe.edu.sg

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Learn About the Phases
P1 Registration Phases
  • Phase 1: For siblings of current students.
  • Phase 2A(1): For children of alumni and School Advisory/Management Committee members.
  • Phase 2A(2): For children of former students and staff.
  • Phase 2A: Combined 2A phase used in newer ballot records.
  • Phase 2B: For parent volunteers and selected community affiliations.
  • Phase 2C: For children with no prior link to the school.
  • Phase 2C(S): Supplementary phase for remaining vacancies.
  • Phase 3: For international students.
Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
95% 106% 118% 129% 140% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 123% 101% 132% 100%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
132%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Highest demand: 2B at 210%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 86 20 41 210 210
Applied 64 88 42 83 0 0
Taken 64 86 20 41 0 0
Taken Rate 43% 102% 210% 202% 0% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
120%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Highest demand: 2B at 196%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 100 27 55 210 210
Applied 51 78 53 69 0 0
Taken 51 78 27 55 0 0
Taken Rate 34% 78% 196% 125% 0% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
113%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Highest demand: 2B at 148%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 95 27 54 210 210
Applied 55 74 40 68 0 0
Taken 55 74 27 54 0 0
Taken Rate 37% 78% 148% 126% 0% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
116%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2B
Highest demand: 2B at 140%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 170 119 67 42 44 210 210
Applied 51 52 24 59 57 0 0
Taken 51 52 24 42 44 0 0
Taken Rate 30% 44% 36% 140% 130% 0% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
120%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Highest demand: 2B at 180%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 170 106 52 35 35 210 210
Applied 64 54 23 63 49 0 0
Taken 64 54 23 35 35 0 0
Taken Rate 38% 51% 44% 180% 140% 0% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
123%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2B
Highest demand: 2B at 162%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 170 116 67 42 43 210 210
Applied 54 49 24 68 63 0 0
Taken 54 49 24 42 43 0 0
Taken Rate 32% 42% 36% 162% 147% 0% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
63%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Highest demand: 2B at 147%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 47 49 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 69 64 0 0
Taken 57 42 17 45 49 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 147% 131% 0% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
54%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 150%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 39 38 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 57 57 0 0
Taken 58 52 23 39 38 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 146% 150% 0% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
62%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Highest demand: 2B at 139%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 46 53 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 64 66 0 0
Taken 57 38 24 38 53 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 139% 125% 0% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
53%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 121%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 45 47 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 54 57 0 0
Taken 58 33 29 43 47 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 120% 121% 0% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
66%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 145%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 50 51 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 64 74 0 0
Taken 53 36 21 49 51 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 128% 145% 0% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
54%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Highest demand: 2B at 133%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 45 44 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 60 54 0 0
Taken 70 25 26 45 44 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 133% 123% 0% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
60%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Highest demand: 2B at 136%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 50 50 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 68 58 0 0
Taken 56 22 32 50 50 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 136% 116% 0% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
59%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2B
Highest demand: 2B at 131%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 48 50 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 63 60 0 0
Taken 57 28 29 48 50 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 131% 120% 0% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
67%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Highest demand: 2B at 134%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 53 52 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 71 69 0 0
Taken 49 21 35 53 52 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 134% 133% 0% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Chij Primary Toa Payoh, or share your own experience below.

"Compact but focus driven school with is embedded within a neighborhood."

Chuan Sim
Chuan Sim

September 22, 2023

"im in my last year in IJ here and i enjoy this school and most of the teachers are nice here :)"

colette tan
colette tan

August 18, 2019

"I am studying here now and I love it! Our teachers are strict (in a good way) yet kind caring and forgiving!"

Rachael Goh
Rachael Goh

July 14, 2019

"Well i was in this school for 6 years and i enjoyed it and deeply missed the teachers."

Thaanushri Nair
Thaanushri Nair

April 24, 2019

"So blessed to have gone to this school. Miss the old school buildings and ponds, but the new one looks fabulous."

Jean Seah
Jean Seah

June 18, 2018

Write A Review