Queenstown Primary School, nestled in the heart of Queenstown, holds a competitive application rate of 105%, with 221 applications for 211 placements. Known for its commitment to holistic education, the school boasts a thriving arts program, earning numerous accolades in national competitions.
Recently, the school made headlines for its innovative STEM initiatives, highlighting its dedication in nurturing tech-savvy future leaders. With its strong community spirit and robust academic achievements, Queenstown Primary promises a well-rounded and enriching learning journey for young minds.
The high application rate underscores its popularity amongst Singaporean parents seeking Primary 1 admission.
Queenstown Primary School
Principal:
Ms Lim Pei Lin Olivia
Vice Principals:
Ms Chew May, Mr Low Kay Kiat
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Queenstown MRT
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 150 | 61 | 35 | 105 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 89 | 17 | 0 | 115 | 0 | 0 | 221 | |
| % Applied | 59% | 28% | 0% | 110% | - | - | - | |
| Taken | 89 | 17 | 0 | 105 | 0 | 0 | 211 | |
| % Taken | 59% | 28% | 0% | 100% | - | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 150 | 87 | 44 | 133 | 23 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 63 | 14 | 1 | 110 | 33 | 0 | 221 | |
| % Applied | 42% | 16% | 2% | 83% | 143% | 0% | 105% | |
| Taken | 63 | 14 | 1 | 110 | 23 | 0 | 211 | |
| % Taken | 42% | 16% | 2% | 83% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 150 | 75 | 36 | 106 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 76 | 28 | 1 | 123 | 0 | 0 | 228 | |
| % Applied | 51% | 37% | 3% | 116% | 0% | 0% | 109% | |
| Taken | 76 | 28 | 1 | 106 | 0 | 0 | 211 | |
| % Taken | 51% | 37% | 3% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 150 | 74 | 40 | 121 | 6 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 76 | 16 | 0 | 115 | 24 | 0 | 231 | |
| % Applied | 51% | 22% | 0% | 95% | 400% | 0% | 110% | |
| Taken | 76 | 16 | 0 | 115 | 6 | 0 | 213 | |
| % Taken | 51% | 22% | 0% | 95% | 100% | 0% | 101% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 200 | 107 | 107 | 60 | 119 | 7 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 93 | 0 | 27 | 1 | 112 | 13 | 0 | 246 | |
| % Applied | 47% | 0% | 25% | 2% | 94% | 186% | 0% | 103% | |
| Taken | 93 | 0 | 27 | 1 | 112 | 7 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 47% | 0% | 25% | 2% | 94% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 200 | 123 | 123 | 75 | 148 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 77 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 154 | 0 | 0 | 247 | |
| % Applied | 39% | 0% | 11% | 3% | 104% | 0% | 0% | 103% | |
| Taken | 77 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 148 | 0 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 0% | 11% | 3% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 200 | 101 | 101 | 60 | 121 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 99 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 132 | 0 | 0 | 252 | |
| % Applied | 50% | 0% | 21% | 0% | 109% | 0% | 0% | 105% | |
| Taken | 99 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 121 | 0 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 50% | 0% | 21% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 72 | 143 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 172 | 0 | 0 | 172 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 120% | 0% | 0% | 72% | |
| Taken | 78 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 143 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 82 | 167 | 67 | 17 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 50 | 0 | 150 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 60% | 75% | 0% | 63% | |
| Taken | 65 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 100 | 50 | 0 | 227 | |
| % Taken | 27% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 60% | 75% | 0% | 95% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 77 | 155 | 35 | 5 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 120 | 30 | 0 | 150 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 77% | 86% | 0% | 63% | |
| Taken | 68 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 120 | 30 | 0 | 237 | |
| % Taken | 28% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 77% | 86% | 0% | 99% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 87 | 173 | 79 | 46 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 94 | 33 | 0 | 128 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 54% | 42% | 0% | 53% | |
| Taken | 56 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 94 | 33 | 0 | 194 | |
| % Taken | 23% | 0% | 4% | 1% | 54% | 42% | 0% | 81% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 79 | 158 | 74 | 35 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 84 | 39 | 0 | 123 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 53% | 53% | 0% | 51% | |
| Taken | 63 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 84 | 39 | 0 | 205 | |
| % Taken | 26% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 53% | 53% | 0% | 85% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 78 | 156 | 75 | 39 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 84 | 16 | 0 | 100 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 54% | 21% | 0% | 42% | |
| Taken | 69 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 83 | 36 | 0 | 203 | |
| % Taken | 29% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 53% | 48% | 0% | 85% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 80 | 159 | 74 | 11 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 88 | 41 | 0 | 129 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 55% | 55% | 0% | 54% | |
| Taken | 74 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 87 | 63 | 0 | 231 | |
| % Taken | 31% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 55% | 85% | 0% | 96% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 71 | 142 | 65 | 49 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 77 | 13 | 0 | 90 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 54% | 20% | 0% | 43% | |
| Taken | 54 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 77 | 16 | 0 | 161 | |
| % Taken | 26% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 54% | 25% | 0% | 77% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 61 | 121 | 54 | 24 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 69 | 27 | 0 | 97 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 57% | 50% | 0% | 46% | |
| Taken | 79 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 69 | 27 | 0 | 185 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 0% | 4% | 2% | 57% | 50% | 0% | 88% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Queenstown Primary School.
"I am a Secondary 1 student and just graduated from this Primary school. Overall, the teachers here are super encouraging and nice and they don’t scold unreasonably. The canteen food is super nice also and I love it. I still miss the school.🥲I would totally recommend this school."
January 09, 2025
"I am a sec 1 student now and I just graduated from QTPS. The teachers in this primary school is very kind and patient. They really played a big role in my primary school journey, making sure everyone understands before moving on. They will take the effort to know all our troubles and difficulties, letting us know that we are not alone. When I was in primary 6, they really stood by us and went the extra mile to help us. A big shout out to my favourite teacher Ms Ratna."
March 03, 2025
"This school is the best I am a current student in Primary 4. The teachers are not unreasonable and do not scold us for not doing our homework once. Definitely recommend this school."
February 10, 2025
"I am a sec 1 student now and i just graduated from this primary school last year. From my experience, all of the teachers in this primary school are very patient during our learning journey especially towards the Primary Leaving School Examination(PSLE). They definitely played a big part in my primary school journey, making it memorable while making sure that every students strives to do their best in their exams, cca, etc. They will also take the initiative to help us with our troubles and difficulties, making sure that we can all feel safe in school. QTPS made me feel like i was home and the pupils there are also very sweet. Shout out to Ms Ratna and Ms Peck who made my journey towards CGS possible! I would definitely recommend children to join QTPS!"
March 03, 2025
"Highly recommend this school! Teachers can be strict but that is part of what helps the students grow in more ways than one. If students make a mistake whether in academics or morally, teachers do give students another opportunity to learn from their mistakes and improve. Enjoyed and still enjoyed my 6 years here! Teachers really care about students' education and the school has rules that keeps the faculty and students safe. Not to mention, the school's counsellors are amazing in their field. Helped me a lot at one point of time. School also educates students on general knowledge about what is happening around the world. Felt very safe in school due to my school's readiness in case of a crisis such as terrorism or a fire by practicing drills. In addition to academics, the school educates students about cyber-wellness, which I have found very useful as many children in this day and age surf the internet for a lengthy period of time. Moreover, school also gives students chances to express themselves and make friends to increase their social circle! In conclusion, this school is suitable for any parent who wants their child to grow, learn, and prosper harmoniously in a safe and conducive environment."
July 18, 2024
"I am a Secondary 1 student N I just graduated. I recommend going Qtps as they have kind teachers. And If you go to that school they might give you a treat 😁"
April 05, 2025