Anglochinese School Junior

16 WINSTEDT ROAD , 227988

67337911

At a glance

Anglo-Chinese School Junior, a prestigious institution in Singapore, had an application rate of 112% for Primary 1 admission, calculated from a pool of 303 applications for 271 placements. Known for its exceptional academic performance, the school also prides itself on a comprehensive Arts programme that includes Music, Dance, and Drama.

School Type
Government-aided Sch
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Newton MRT Station
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government-aided Sch Boys' School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Newton MRT Station
Principal

MISS CHEE CHUERN HWEI CHERYL

Vice Principals

MR GOH SHEOW EN, MR FENG WENFU

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
90% 100% 110% 120% 130% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 112% 100% 124% 100% 90% 100% 110% 120% 130% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 112% 100% 124% 100%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. When MOE marks a phase for balloting, the school was oversubscribed for that phase.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
124%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Balloting
Yes
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S)
Vacancies 210 134 30 61 0
Applied 76 104 61 95 0
Taken 76 104 30 61 0
Taken Rate 36% 78% 203% 156% -
Balloting - - Yes Yes -
Vacancies for ballot - - 30 61 -
Balloting applicants - - 54 83 -
Balloted group - - SC within 1km SC within 1km -
MOE balloting notes

MOE conducts balloting only when there are more applicants than remaining vacancies. The table above shows the phase counts and the priority group that had to ballot.

Highest demand: 2B at 203%
2B balloted
Priority group

Singapore Citizen children residing within 1km of the school.

2C balloted
Priority group

Singapore Citizen children residing within 1km of the school.

2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
112%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 135 31 63 270 270
Applied 75 102 50 76 0 0
Taken 75 102 31 63 0 0
Taken Rate 36% 76% 161% 121% 0% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
114%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 134 31 62 270 270
Applied 76 101 52 79 0 0
Taken 76 101 31 62 0 0
Taken Rate 36% 75% 168% 127% 0% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
117%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 132 27 53 270 270
Applied 78 112 57 69 0 0
Taken 78 112 27 53 0 0
Taken Rate 37% 85% 211% 130% 0% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. When MOE marks a phase for balloting, the school was oversubscribed for that phase.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
114%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 230 142 45 33 33 270 270
Applied 88 97 19 54 51 0 0
Taken 88 97 19 33 33 0 0
Taken Rate 38% 68% 42% 164% 155% 0% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
119%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 230 137 30 26 25 270 270
Applied 93 107 20 59 41 0 0
Taken 93 107 20 26 25 0 0
Taken Rate 40% 78% 67% 227% 164% 0% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
112%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 230 155 67 46 46 270 270
Applied 75 88 15 65 60 0 0
Taken 75 88 15 46 46 0 0
Taken Rate 33% 57% 22% 141% 130% 0% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
40%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 41 41 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 55 52 0 0
Taken 80 87 21 41 41 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 134% 127% 0% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
46%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 51 50 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 56 67 0 0
Taken 72 78 19 51 50 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 110% 134% 0% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
53%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 50 49 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 79 65 0 0
Taken 76 65 30 50 49 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 158% 133% 0% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
61%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 58 58 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 90 75 0 0
Taken 67 65 22 58 58 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 155% 129% 0% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
65%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 73 73 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 75 101 0 0
Taken 65 36 23 73 73 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 103% 138% 0% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
45%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 47 45 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 73 49 0 0
Taken 83 55 39 48 45 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 155% 109% 0% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
52%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 54 54 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 76 64 0 0
Taken 74 56 32 54 54 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 141% 119% 0% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
59%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 64 63 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 80 79 0 0
Taken 68 44 31 64 63 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 125% 125% 0% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
59%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 63 63 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 83 76 0 0
Taken 77 42 24 64 63 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 132% 121% 0% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Anglochinese School Junior, or share your own experience below.

"So goated and so many memories"

John Paul

April 09, 2025

"Was a student here once. The discipline master, Mr Chen caned my classmate for not wearing a tank top underneath. Hello? Wake up."

Cynthia Wong

March 17, 2025

"Amazing place for almost all sorts of play, good memories here and there was the board at the old playground :O However there is a crazy amount of cars to deal with if queuing to get into the school to drop off students."

Isaac Kwan

July 31, 2024

"Illegal stopping/parking of parents' cars should be addressed immediately. Stop feeling entitled."

Tiger Records

November 08, 2023

"Rude Security Guard I found a ezlink card that belongs to the student from this school. I then used my 1 hour lunch time to make my way down all the way from Queenstown. When I reached the security gate house, I told the security guard that I picked up an ezlink card that belongs to one of the student from this school and hence, I would like to hand it over to the General office. However, he told me in a rude manner that I can't drive in which I understand but he told me to park my car at the Newton public carpark instead of offering me help to handover the ezlink card till I told him that it is impossible for me to do that as I am running out of time which leave him no choice but to take the card from me.I think the security brain lock in the safe box. After handing it over to him, I contacted the school's General office to inform them that I have already handed over the ezlink card to the security guard. The staff that attended to me was very polite unlike the security guard."

SW Wong

February 08, 2022

"Supposed to be a lay-by only for picking up children. The cones denote that this is a no parking zone but this car was parked there for more than 10 minutes before 1.30pm and nobody bothered to do anything right by implementing the rules. Says alot about the moral values and religous influence on the morals"

Noel Gwee

July 04, 2018

Write A Review