Elias Park Primary School, located in the heart of Singapore, boasts an application rate of 120% - a clear sign of its popularity among parents. With 196 applications for 163 placements, competition for a spot is keen.
The school is known for its exceptional academics and a distinctive sports program that has garnered numerous accolades. Elias Park has recently been in news for its innovative STEM programme, preparing students for the future.
If your child thrives in a competitive and stimulating environment, Elias Park Primary School is definitely worth considering.
Elias Park Primary School
Principal:
Mdm Chua Pei Pei
Vice Principals:
Mr Mohamad Noor Bin Abdul Manaf@Muhamad Noor Abdul Manaf, Mr Ho Fu Chew
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Pasir Ris MRT
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 100 | 27 | 22 | 66 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 74 | 21 | 0 | 115 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Applied | 74% | 78% | 0% | 174% | - | - | - | |
| Taken | 74 | 21 | 0 | 66 | 0 | 0 | 161 | |
| % Taken | 74% | 78% | 0% | 100% | - | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 100 | 23 | 20 | 60 | 160 | 160 | 160 |
| Applied | 77 | 28 | 3 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 196 | |
| % Applied | 77% | 122% | 15% | 147% | 0% | 0% | 123% | |
| Taken | 77 | 23 | 3 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 163 | |
| % Taken | 77% | 100% | 15% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 102% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 100 | 23 | 20 | 61 | 160 | 160 | 160 |
| Applied | 77 | 22 | 0 | 101 | 0 | 0 | 200 | |
| % Applied | 77% | 96% | 0% | 166% | 0% | 0% | 125% | |
| Taken | 77 | 22 | 0 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 160 | |
| % Taken | 77% | 96% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 120 | 40 | 30 | 89 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 80 | 10 | 2 | 132 | 0 | 0 | 224 | |
| % Applied | 67% | 25% | 7% | 148% | 0% | 0% | 124% | |
| Taken | 80 | 10 | 2 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 181 | |
| % Taken | 67% | 25% | 7% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 150 | 69 | 69 | 44 | 89 | 190 | 190 | 190 |
| Applied | 81 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 108 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Applied | 54% | 0% | 30% | 0% | 121% | 0% | 0% | 111% | |
| Taken | 81 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 191 | |
| % Taken | 54% | 0% | 30% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 140 | 55 | 55 | 42 | 84 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 85 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 98 | 0 | 0 | 195 | |
| % Applied | 61% | 0% | 22% | 0% | 117% | 0% | 0% | 108% | |
| Taken | 85 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 181 | |
| % Taken | 61% | 0% | 22% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 140 | 77 | 77 | 53 | 105 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 63 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 116 | 0 | 0 | 193 | |
| % Applied | 45% | 0% | 17% | 2% | 110% | 0% | 0% | 107% | |
| Taken | 63 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 105 | 0 | 0 | 182 | |
| % Taken | 45% | 0% | 17% | 2% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 46 | 93 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 112 | 0 | 0 | 112 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 120% | 0% | 0% | 62% | |
| Taken | 72 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 93 | 0 | 0 | 181 | |
| % Taken | 40% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 57 | 114 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 119 | 0 | 0 | 119 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 104% | 0% | 0% | 66% | |
| Taken | 62 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 114 | 0 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 34% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 56 | 111 | 18 | 8 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 93 | 10 | 0 | 103 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 84% | 56% | 0% | 57% | |
| Taken | 64 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 93 | 10 | 0 | 172 | |
| % Taken | 36% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 84% | 56% | 0% | 96% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 49 | 98 | 1 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 97 | 1 | 0 | 98 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 99% | 100% | 0% | 54% | |
| Taken | 70 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 97 | 1 | 0 | 181 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 99% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 56 | 110 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 113 | 0 | 0 | 114 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 103% | 0% | 0% | 63% | |
| Taken | 60 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 110 | 0 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 0% | 5% | 2% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 52 | 102 | 7 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 95 | 6 | 0 | 102 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 93% | 86% | 0% | 57% | |
| Taken | 63 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 95 | 7 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 35% | 0% | 8% | 2% | 93% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 55 | 107 | 25 | 23 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 81 | 2 | 0 | 85 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 76% | 8% | 0% | 47% | |
| Taken | 62 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 82 | 2 | 0 | 157 | |
| % Taken | 34% | 0% | 5% | 4% | 77% | 8% | 0% | 87% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 47 | 93 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 97 | 0 | 0 | 97 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 104% | 0% | 0% | 54% | |
| Taken | 77 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 93 | 0 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 43% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 52 | 104 | 15 | 2 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 11 | 0 | 101 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 87% | 73% | 0% | 56% | |
| Taken | 67 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 90 | 11 | 0 | 177 | |
| % Taken | 37% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 87% | 73% | 0% | 98% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Elias Park Primary School.
"BEST.SCHOOL.EVER. Queues are long but worth waiting. Except that recess is only 30 minutes…. Teachers are approachable and friendly. Also, lots of people tagging and running around the canteen…im one of them……"
January 23, 2025
"i mean its ok lah. sum teachers there are sort of ‘unreasonable’ but most of them r ok. yall newbies must behave or the teachers will lose it and start yelling and punish the while class and like what my fren said below, mrs tham is best teacher teehee the school toilets sumtimes, dirty sumtimes clean. theres a bidet sooo yayyy!!!! the food is ok but theres only 3 halal stores, the lines r long sumtimes. for any of yall going there, i wish u the best in this school! (ITS NOT BAD OR ANYTHING JS DONT MISBEHAVE) k thats the end of my essay thankz -zoomiez"
December 21, 2024
"Ex student here. I'll say the environment is ok lah, but they might want to fix the level one toilet stench. Most of the school staff are kind and understanding(except for SOME TEACHERS, but unless ur super unlucky u will meet the good teachers) and the canteen food is pretty good. Overall I will recommend this school is pretty good. Just be warned that the kids are a bit overcompetitive but other than that, I'd recommend this school! (Mrs tham best teacher)"
November 21, 2024
"im back again i give new review ok i too lenient last time. pri 1 to pri 4 ok BUT there is one particular teacher. Mr Yusman, dont be biased to the girls ok u old man and “assumption” method in math is real we dont care about “supposition” and when i picked up my pencil u asked me to write reflection because i was talking. Understandable, i do love talking to my pencil. Hope u enjoyed that reflection i wrote of u :)"
March 05, 2025
"Very good school with great teachers to support along the way . In my opinion, had fun during the last 6 years of my life but had some so called "traumatic" experience that happened last year. Until now I still have that hatred for that person. But, once PSLE was coming, I started focusing on studies and teachers were so supportive that I really appreciate them a lot . The CCA's are excellent! If you like singing strongly encourage you to join choir. But want to take up something else? You guys will have a lesson called PAL in P2. In that case you guys will have a chance in learning something and find out the things you like. After that, when you are P3 teachers will either recommend you to join a CCA or you can choose yourself. The best thing is join the CCA the teachers recommends you as it gives you better experience. The canteen food was nice from a stall named Makan sedap the vendors are very friendly. Along the years, many stalls closed down and that was kinda sad for me. If you are having hard time in the school I strongly encourage you to see your form teachers or the counselor because they are always ready to help you with studies or personal things you have been keeping away from teachers. I totally recommend students to join this school as you will have the best 6 years with many programmes to take up and awards to collect. Here is one of my P6 picture"
March 11, 2023
"I came here to play a volleyball match in 2023 and this school is amazing!! I love it. It's HUGE!!"
April 04, 2025