Jiemin Primary School, nestled in the heart of Yishun, is a highly sought-after institution with a 100% application rate. This family-oriented school has a rich history of academic excellence and was lauded for its outstanding performance in the recent National Primary School Chinese Storytelling Competition.
Known for its holistic education approach, Jiemin offers an array of enriching programs from sports to arts. The school's popular Robotics Club sparks interest in STEM education, preparing students for a technology-driven future.
Jiemin provides a nurturing environment that appeals to Singaporean families, making it a hot spot for Primary 1 admissions.
Jiemin Primary School
Principal:
Mr Andy Mickey Choong Tek Choy
Vice Principals:
Mrs Nur Fatimah Frauder, Ms Wong Kah Wan
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Yishun MRT Station
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 130 | 55 | 34 | 101 | 63 | 40 | 40 |
| Applied | 75 | 14 | 0 | 38 | 23 | 0 | 150 | |
| % Applied | 58% | 25% | 0% | 38% | 37% | 0% | 375% | |
| Taken | 75 | 14 | 0 | 38 | 23 | 0 | 150 | |
| % Taken | 58% | 25% | 0% | 38% | 37% | 0% | 375% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 130 | 74 | 39 | 116 | 60 | 16 | 190 |
| Applied | 56 | 18 | 0 | 56 | 44 | 0 | 174 | |
| % Applied | 43% | 24% | 0% | 48% | 73% | 0% | 92% | |
| Taken | 56 | 18 | 0 | 56 | 44 | 0 | 174 | |
| % Taken | 43% | 24% | 0% | 48% | 73% | 0% | 92% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 160 | 92 | 44 | 134 | 77 | 23 | 220 |
| Applied | 68 | 19 | 0 | 57 | 54 | 0 | 198 | |
| % Applied | 43% | 21% | 0% | 43% | 70% | 0% | 90% | |
| Taken | 68 | 19 | 0 | 57 | 54 | 0 | 198 | |
| % Taken | 43% | 21% | 0% | 43% | 70% | 0% | 90% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 120 | 46 | 28 | 83 | 22 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 74 | 22 | 1 | 62 | 27 | 0 | 186 | |
| % Applied | 62% | 48% | 4% | 75% | 123% | 0% | 103% | |
| Taken | 74 | 22 | 1 | 62 | 22 | 0 | 181 | |
| % Taken | 62% | 48% | 4% | 75% | 100% | 0% | 101% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 180 | 116 | 116 | 66 | 130 | 55 | 32 | 220 |
| Applied | 64 | 0 | 24 | 2 | 76 | 23 | 0 | 189 | |
| % Applied | 36% | 0% | 21% | 3% | 58% | 42% | 0% | 86% | |
| Taken | 64 | 0 | 24 | 2 | 76 | 23 | 0 | 189 | |
| % Taken | 36% | 0% | 21% | 3% | 58% | 42% | 0% | 86% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 180 | 101 | 101 | 51 | 101 | 27 | 13 | 220 |
| Applied | 79 | 0 | 39 | 1 | 74 | 14 | 0 | 207 | |
| % Applied | 44% | 0% | 39% | 2% | 73% | 52% | 0% | 94% | |
| Taken | 79 | 0 | 39 | 1 | 74 | 14 | 0 | 207 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 0% | 39% | 2% | 73% | 52% | 0% | 94% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 140 | 76 | 76 | 46 | 85 | 1 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 64 | 0 | 25 | 7 | 84 | 1 | 0 | 181 | |
| % Applied | 46% | 0% | 33% | 15% | 99% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Taken | 64 | 0 | 25 | 7 | 84 | 1 | 0 | 181 | |
| % Taken | 46% | 0% | 33% | 15% | 99% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 47 | 87 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 101 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 19% | 106% | 0% | 0% | 48% | |
| Taken | 77 | 0 | 39 | 7 | 87 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 37% | 0% | 19% | 15% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 43 | 77 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 98 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 23% | 114% | 0% | 0% | 54% | |
| Taken | 70 | 0 | 24 | 9 | 77 | 0 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 0% | 13% | 21% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 54 | 102 | 24 | 13 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 78 | 11 | 0 | 94 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9% | 76% | 46% | 0% | 52% | |
| Taken | 54 | 0 | 19 | 5 | 78 | 11 | 0 | 167 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 0% | 11% | 9% | 76% | 46% | 0% | 93% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 41 | 76 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 94 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 113% | 0% | 0% | 52% | |
| Taken | 75 | 0 | 23 | 6 | 76 | 0 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 42% | 0% | 13% | 15% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 40 | 71 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 82 | 0 | 0 | 91 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 23% | 115% | 0% | 0% | 51% | |
| Taken | 73 | 0 | 28 | 8 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 0% | 16% | 20% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 35 | 59 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 31% | 151% | 0% | 0% | 56% | |
| Taken | 76 | 0 | 34 | 11 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 42% | 0% | 19% | 31% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 44 | 80 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 96 | 0 | 0 | 103 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 16% | 120% | 0% | 0% | 57% | |
| Taken | 70 | 0 | 23 | 7 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 0% | 13% | 16% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 45 | 89 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 124 | 0 | 0 | 125 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 139% | 0% | 0% | 69% | |
| Taken | 79 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 181 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 0% | 7% | 2% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 36 | 71 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 110 | 0 | 0 | 111 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 155% | 0% | 0% | 62% | |
| Taken | 91 | 0 | 17 | 1 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 51% | 0% | 9% | 3% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Jiemin Primary School.
"This school is absolute garbage. Each and every teacher has no idea how to treat children. The way they deal with disciplinary issues is sub par. The teachers in this school treat boys like criminals in a jail cell, as if they had committed a major crime. The only way they deal with stuff is shouting, SHOUTING. If you see the other reviews you would know how loud they shout. Even from the nearby blocks you can hear the screaming. During o level they shout like they own Singapore liddat. Like do they not care about others? This school has traumatised me down to the very bone. If the school is reading this, please change your ways, I don’t want my brother to suffer the way I did."
February 19, 2025
"Amazing school with friendly teachers especially my Form Teacher and Co-Form Teacher. Great students and fun events. Totally recommend this school to future Primary Schoolers."
November 13, 2024
"I am from a student over there. I love this school. I will cherish my love like a treasure to this school when I have to say goodbye."
January 02, 2025
"I was in a bus than a group of students from this school was talking and shouting so loud and talking with inaproprate words"
January 24, 2025
"A typical, average neighbour government school in Yishun. Both teaching and non teaching staff are friendly. Majority of the students are from the neighbour."
October 12, 2018
"My best friend is swim safer level one and the teacher forced her to float in the pool without any board and she started crying."
April 11, 2025