At Marsiling Primary School, your child's future is in excellent hands. This institution boasts a 100% application rate, with every one of the 173 applicants successfully securing a placement.
Located in the heart of Marsiling, the school prides itself on its holistic education program, emphasizing both academic excellence and character development. Marsiling Primary is renowned for its impressive recent achievements, including winning the national school sports championships.
Their unique STEM program also prepares students for the future, nurturing them into inquisitive, innovative thinkers. This highly competitive school is a local favourite, making it a top choice for Singaporean parents seeking a well-rounded education for their children.
Marsiling Primary School
Mdm Sim Siaw Cheng
Mr Jackson Kek, Mr Christopher Koh Teik Huat
Single Session
Marsiling MRT Station
Government School
Ballot Results
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 120 | 54 | 35 | 104 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 66 | 10 | 0 | 99 | 8 | 0 | 183 | |
| % Applied | 55% | 19% | 0% | 95% | 160% | - | - | |
| Taken | 66 | 10 | 0 | 99 | 5 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 55% | 19% | 0% | 95% | 100% | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 120 | 60 | 34 | 103 | 14 | 8 | 180 |
| Applied | 60 | 17 | 0 | 90 | 6 | 0 | 173 | |
| % Applied | 50% | 28% | 0% | 87% | 43% | 0% | 96% | |
| Taken | 60 | 17 | 0 | 90 | 6 | 0 | 173 | |
| % Taken | 50% | 28% | 0% | 87% | 43% | 0% | 96% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 150 | 98 | 48 | 143 | 69 | 65 | 210 |
| Applied | 52 | 15 | 0 | 74 | 4 | 0 | 145 | |
| % Applied | 35% | 15% | 0% | 52% | 6% | 0% | 69% | |
| Taken | 52 | 15 | 0 | 74 | 4 | 0 | 145 | |
| % Taken | 35% | 15% | 0% | 52% | 6% | 0% | 69% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 150 | 88 | 46 | 137 | 55 | 37 | 210 |
| Applied | 62 | 11 | 0 | 82 | 18 | 0 | 173 | |
| % Applied | 41% | 13% | 0% | 60% | 33% | 0% | 82% | |
| Taken | 62 | 11 | 0 | 82 | 18 | 0 | 173 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 13% | 0% | 60% | 33% | 0% | 82% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 170 | 106 | 107 | 67 | 134 | 56 | 44 | 210 |
| Applied | 64 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 78 | 12 | 0 | 168 | |
| % Applied | 38% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 58% | 21% | 0% | 80% | |
| Taken | 64 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 78 | 12 | 0 | 168 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 58% | 21% | 0% | 80% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 170 | 115 | 115 | 74 | 147 | 72 | 69 | 210 |
| Applied | 55 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 77 | 3 | 0 | 143 | |
| % Applied | 32% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 52% | 4% | 0% | 68% | |
| Taken | 55 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 77 | 3 | 0 | 143 | |
| % Taken | 32% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 52% | 4% | 0% | 68% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 140 | 77 | 77 | 54 | 107 | 38 | 31 | 180 |
| Applied | 63 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 69 | 7 | 0 | 149 | |
| % Applied | 45% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 64% | 18% | 0% | 83% | |
| Taken | 63 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 69 | 7 | 0 | 149 | |
| % Taken | 45% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 64% | 18% | 0% | 83% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 96 | 191 | 144 | 140 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 4 | 0 | 51 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 3% | 0% | 21% | |
| Taken | 42 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 47 | 4 | 0 | 100 | |
| % Taken | 18% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 25% | 3% | 0% | 42% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 61 | 122 | 79 | 69 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 10 | 0 | 54 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 13% | 0% | 30% | |
| Taken | 48 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 43 | 10 | 0 | 112 | |
| % Taken | 27% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 35% | 13% | 0% | 62% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 68 | 134 | 76 | 66 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 59 | 10 | 0 | 71 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 44% | 13% | 0% | 39% | |
| Taken | 38 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 58 | 10 | 0 | 114 | |
| % Taken | 21% | 0% | 4% | 1% | 43% | 13% | 0% | 63% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 73 | 146 | 90 | 83 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 7 | 0 | 64 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 39% | 8% | 0% | 30% | |
| Taken | 50 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 56 | 7 | 0 | 127 | |
| % Taken | 24% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 38% | 8% | 0% | 60% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 81 | 162 | 105 | 98 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 7 | 0 | 64 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 35% | 7% | 0% | 27% | |
| Taken | 67 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 57 | 7 | 0 | 142 | |
| % Taken | 28% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 35% | 7% | 0% | 59% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 79 | 157 | 92 | 33 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 17 | 0 | 83 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 42% | 18% | 0% | 35% | |
| Taken | 79 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 66 | 59 | 0 | 208 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 42% | 64% | 0% | 87% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 82 | 163 | 73 | 50 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 93 | 12 | 0 | 105 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 57% | 16% | 0% | 44% | |
| Taken | 66 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 92 | 23 | 0 | 192 | |
| % Taken | 28% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 56% | 32% | 0% | 80% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 92 | 182 | 105 | 80 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 77 | 18 | 0 | 96 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 42% | 17% | 0% | 36% | |
| Taken | 70 | 0 | 17 | 1 | 77 | 25 | 0 | 190 | |
| % Taken | 26% | 0% | 6% | 1% | 42% | 24% | 0% | 70% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 101 | 201 | 124 | 73 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 20 | 0 | 100 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 40% | 16% | 0% | 37% | |
| Taken | 57 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 80 | 20 | 0 | 169 | |
| % Taken | 21% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 40% | 16% | 0% | 63% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Marsiling Primary School.
"The school is great i went there"
December 02, 2024
"I'm a student from Marsiling Primary, and i would like to say that this is an amazing school! I have been here for 6 years and as they go by, the upgrades/improvements, facilities, teachers, activities and students are fantastic! You're child is guaranteed to learn effectively, apply school values and have a growth mindset, learning from this school. Some students might even have the chance to go overseas, like Taiwan and Malaysia, for example. And they are sure to have a great time here, at MPS."
July 20, 2019
"Hi. I am a student from Marsiling Primary School.This school is really great! You guys should join this amazing school.Now the school has a new Indoor sports hall and a new field! I really love this school. Thank you Marsiling Primary School for heling me in my studies."
December 05, 2018
"This is my school and I'm so proud to be a Marsilian! 😃 We just had the PERL Upgrading and our school is super beautiful now. We have an ISH and five MTV Learning Spaces (faSCInation, Lights Camera Action!, Eureka, to-gather and Kaleidoscope). We just celebrated our Diamond Jubilee this year on 16 November! You guys should join this school! 😃"
December 26, 2018
"This is the best school in the North side. Would really recommend for your kids"
June 25, 2023