Pei Hwa Presbyterian Primary School, located in the heart of Singapore, boasts an application rate of 135%, signifying its high demand and competitiveness. This well-established institution distinguishes itself with its strong emphasis on holistic development, offering robust programs in sports, arts, and STEM.
Notably, Pei Hwa has consistently achieved remarkable results in national examinations and competitions, making it a top choice among parents. Despite the high application rate, the school's commitment to nurturing future leaders and innovators continues to attract a large number of applications each year.
Secure your child's spot today in this prestigious school to kickstart their journey towards academic excellence.
Pei Hwa Presbyterian Primary School
Principal:
Mdm Chong Ai Choo Allison
Vice Principals:
Mdm Yong Ming Woei Chloe, Mr Leong Wei Ming Caleb
Session Type:
Double Session
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Beauty World
School Type:
Government-aided Sch
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 164 | 53 | 20 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 111 | 120 | 51 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 366 | |
| % Applied | 68% | 226% | 255% | 205% | - | - | - | |
| Taken | 111 | 53 | 20 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 225 | |
| % Taken | 68% | 100% | 100% | 100% | - | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 164 | 75 | 20 | 41 | 224 | 224 | 224 |
| Applied | 89 | 127 | 22 | 66 | 0 | 0 | 304 | |
| % Applied | 54% | 169% | 110% | 161% | 0% | 0% | 136% | |
| Taken | 89 | 75 | 20 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 225 | |
| % Taken | 54% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 164 | 62 | 20 | 40 | 224 | 224 | 224 |
| Applied | 102 | 93 | 32 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 302 | |
| % Applied | 62% | 150% | 160% | 188% | 0% | 0% | 135% | |
| Taken | 102 | 62 | 20 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 224 | |
| % Taken | 62% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 164 | 44 | 20 | 41 | 224 | 224 | 224 |
| Applied | 121 | 112 | 37 | 87 | 0 | 0 | 357 | |
| % Applied | 74% | 255% | 185% | 212% | 0% | 0% | 159% | |
| Taken | 121 | 44 | 20 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 226 | |
| % Taken | 74% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 184 | 71 | 224 | 21 | 21 | 224 | 224 | 224 |
| Applied | 113 | 86 | 0 | 31 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 283 | |
| % Applied | 61% | 121% | 0% | 148% | 252% | 0% | 0% | 126% | |
| Taken | 113 | 71 | 0 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 226 | |
| % Taken | 61% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 184 | 67 | 224 | 20 | 21 | 224 | 224 | 224 |
| Applied | 118 | 69 | 0 | 29 | 63 | 0 | 0 | 279 | |
| % Applied | 64% | 103% | 0% | 145% | 300% | 0% | 0% | 125% | |
| Taken | 118 | 67 | 0 | 20 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 226 | |
| % Taken | 64% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 184 | 68 | 24 | 20 | 21 | 224 | 224 | 224 |
| Applied | 116 | 44 | 44 | 41 | 51 | 0 | 0 | 296 | |
| % Applied | 63% | 65% | 183% | 205% | 243% | 0% | 0% | 132% | |
| Taken | 116 | 44 | 24 | 20 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 225 | |
| % Taken | 63% | 65% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 22 | 27 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 83 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 164% | 174% | 0% | 0% | 31% | |
| Taken | 128 | 28 | 71 | 16 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 47% | 10% | 26% | 73% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 39 | 45 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 111 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 126% | 138% | 0% | 0% | 41% | |
| Taken | 121 | 0 | 71 | 33 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 45% | 0% | 26% | 85% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 33 | 41 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 91 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 142% | 107% | 0% | 0% | 34% | |
| Taken | 130 | 0 | 75 | 24 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 48% | 0% | 28% | 73% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 300 | 300 | 300 | 50 | 56 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 69 | 0 | 0 | 117 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 96% | 123% | 0% | 0% | 39% | |
| Taken | 134 | 0 | 66 | 44 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 300 | |
| % Taken | 45% | 0% | 22% | 88% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 300 | 300 | 300 | 40 | 40 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 93 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 103% | 130% | 0% | 0% | 31% | |
| Taken | 144 | 0 | 76 | 40 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 300 | |
| % Taken | 48% | 0% | 25% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 300 | 300 | 300 | 34 | 33 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 106 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 153% | 164% | 0% | 0% | 35% | |
| Taken | 144 | 1 | 88 | 34 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 300 | |
| % Taken | 48% | 0% | 29% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 300 | 300 | 300 | 28 | 27 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 82 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 143% | 156% | 0% | 0% | 27% | |
| Taken | 174 | 0 | 71 | 28 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 300 | |
| % Taken | 58% | 0% | 24% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 300 | 300 | 300 | 44 | 43 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 128 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 159% | 135% | 0% | 0% | 43% | |
| Taken | 158 | 1 | 54 | 44 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 300 | |
| % Taken | 53% | 0% | 18% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 330 | 330 | 330 | 44 | 44 | 330 | 330 | 330 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 68 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 135 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 155% | 152% | 0% | 0% | 41% | |
| Taken | 173 | 0 | 69 | 44 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 330 | |
| % Taken | 52% | 0% | 21% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Pei Hwa Presbyterian Primary School.
"For the aspiring keyboard warriors, let's not post any further comments regarding the incident. The 1 star review comments are NOT fair to the school, NOT fair to the staff & NOT fair to the students as they are all innocent parties. The staff involved has permanently left the school & MOE. End of story. Let's be positive & encourage one another. The incident has not harmed anyone except for the families involved. So let's be kind 😊 RE: I am just a normal Singaporean, not affiliated to the school in any way, but just annoyed & kaypoh."
October 21, 2024
"Walked past this school while passing by the shell station. The building has been rebuilt since many many years ago. Looks alot bigger and more grand now."
March 28, 2024
"Me and my sister are both studying there, very good school( why are y’all posting one star cos of the vp? This is about the school, not the vp)"
January 16, 2025
"Pei hwa Presbyterian primary school is a very good school , they students there show respect and the teachers are very friendly and willing to teach , I was a student there and one of the best teachers are probably Mr Idris chua and Mr John Leung they teach me step by step until I understand ,you can even ask them to repeat a lot of times if you don't understand, the toilets are very clean and please come to this school ,is indeed a excellent school"
November 26, 2024
"The scandalous vp who did something bad- when talking to parent during feedback will start by asking you for you and your spouse profession before he decide to talk to you further. If u r influential he won't pretend not to hear you by standing there and waiting for you to leave."
October 20, 2024
"Not even good they are racist even though me Chinese is better and even one of the top. Even though I’m darker in skin both teachers and classmates are racist if your darker skin, here’s not the place"
April 19, 2025