Peiying Primary School

651 YISHUN RING ROAD , 768687

62575684

At a glance

Peiying Primary School is a government co-ed school that offers a comprehensive academic foundation and a broad range of co-curricular activities. This popular institution fosters a balanced approach to learning, focusing on academic success along with holistic development.

School Type

Government School

Session Type

Single Session

Nearest MRT

Khatib

Latest Ballot Year

2025

Government School Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Khatib

Estimated demand near this school: High

High

Directional estimate based on the recent average applied rate across ballot years, SingStat children aged 5 to 9 in the area, and nearby vacancies.

Latest ballot snapshot

Show details Hide details

SingStat: 320 children aged 5 to 9 in Khatib (subzone), 3.1% of the area.

Year

2025

Segment

- -

Distance

Phases

2C(S)

Applied rate

108%

Average applied rate

43%

SingStat children (5 to 9)

320

SingStat share

3.1%

SingStat area

Khatib (subzone)

Nearby vacancies (2km)

1,790

Children per vacancy

0.18:1

MOE balloted - - in 2025 in phases 2C(S).

Khatib (subzone). Most relevant if your child is - -.

Principal

MADAM WONG WEI YONG

Vice Principals

MR ABDUL RANI BIN IDRIS, MDM TAN MENG HUI

Website

http://www.peiyingpri.moe.edu.sg

peiying_ps@moe.edu.sg

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate

Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. When MOE marks a phase for balloting, the school was oversubscribed for that phase.

2025

Historical ballot data

Vacancies

200

Applied Rate

108%

Taken Rate

100%

Highest Demand

2C(S)

Balloting

Yes

Metric	Phase 1	2A	2B	2C	2C(S)
Vacancies	140	66	35	105	52
Applied	74	21	0	53	67
Taken	74	21	0	53	52
Taken Rate	53%	32%	0%	50%	129%
Balloting	-	-	-	-	Yes
Vacancies for ballot	-	-	-	-	0
Balloting applicants	-	-	-	-	0
Balloted group	-	-	-	-	-

MOE balloting notes

MOE ballots only when applicants exceed remaining vacancies. The table above shows the phase counts and whether SC or PR had to ballot for each phase.

Highest demand: 2C(S) at 129%

Show details Hide details

2C(S)

Balloted group (SC/PR)

MOE did not publish a priority group for this phase.

2024

Historical ballot data

Vacancies

190

Applied Rate

120%

Taken Rate

100%

Highest Demand

2C(S)

Metric	Phase 1	2A	2B	2C	2C(S)	3
Vacancies	130	54	33	99	51	190
Applied	76	15	0	48	89	0
Taken	76	15	0	48	51	0
Taken Rate	58%	28%	0%	48%	175%	0%

2023

Historical ballot data

Vacancies

220

Applied Rate

115%

Taken Rate

100%

Highest Demand

2C(S)

Metric	Phase 1	2A	2B	2C	2C(S)	3
Vacancies	160	90	40	121	73	220
Applied	70	29	0	49	105	0
Taken	70	29	0	49	73	0
Taken Rate	44%	32%	0%	40%	144%	0%

2022

Historical ballot data

Vacancies

190

Applied Rate

111%

Taken Rate

100%

Highest Demand

2C(S)

Metric	Phase 1	2A	2B	2C	2C(S)	3
Vacancies	130	64	36	107	62	190
Applied	66	17	0	45	82	0
Taken	66	17	0	45	62	0
Taken Rate	51%	27%	0%	42%	132%	0%

Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. When MOE marks a phase for balloting, the school was oversubscribed for that phase.

2021

Historical ballot data

Vacancies

220

Applied Rate

105%

Taken Rate

101%

Highest Demand

2C(S)

Metric	Phase 1	2A(1)	2A(2)	2B	2C	2C(S)	3
Vacancies	180	104	104	63	126	84	220
Applied	76	0	18	0	44	93	0
Taken	76	0	18	0	44	84	0
Taken Rate	42%	0%	17%	0%	35%	111%	0%

2020

Historical ballot data

Vacancies

190

Applied Rate

98%

Taken Rate

98%

Highest Demand

2C(S)

Metric	Phase 1	2A(1)	2A(2)	2B	2C	2C(S)	3
Vacancies	150	69	69	47	93	49	4
Applied	81	0	16	0	44	45	0
Taken	81	0	16	0	44	45	0
Taken Rate	54%	0%	23%	0%	47%	92%	0%

2019

Historical ballot data

Vacancies

180

Applied Rate

91%

Taken Rate

91%

Highest Demand

2C(S)

Metric	Phase 1	2A(1)	2A(2)	2B	2C	2C(S)	3
Vacancies	140	84	84	58	115	74	18
Applied	56	0	10	0	41	56	0
Taken	56	0	10	0	41	56	0
Taken Rate	40%	0%	12%	0%	36%	76%	0%

2018

Historical ballot data

Vacancies

210

Applied Rate

72%

Taken Rate

100%

Highest Demand

2C(S)

Metric	Phase 1	2A(1)	2A(2)	2B	2C	2C(S)	3
Vacancies	210	210	210	71	141	95	210
Applied	0	0	0	1	46	105	0
Taken	52	0	17	0	46	95	0
Taken Rate	0%	0%	0%	1%	33%	111%	0%

2017

Historical ballot data

Vacancies

180

Applied Rate

50%

Taken Rate

88%

Highest Demand

2C(S)

Metric	Phase 1	2A(1)	2A(2)	2B	2C	2C(S)	3
Vacancies	180	180	180	56	112	62	22
Applied	0	0	0	0	50	40	0
Taken	53	0	16	0	50	40	0
Taken Rate	0%	0%	0%	0%	45%	65%	0%

2016

Historical ballot data

Vacancies

180

Applied Rate

44%

Taken Rate

83%

Highest Demand

Metric	Phase 1	2A(1)	2A(2)	2B	2C	2C(S)	3
Vacancies	180	180	180	56	113	61	33
Applied	0	0	0	0	52	28	0
Taken	55	0	14	0	52	28	0
Taken Rate	0%	0%	0%	0%	46%	46%	0%

2015

Historical ballot data

Vacancies

180

Applied Rate

42%

Taken Rate

84%

Highest Demand

Metric	Phase 1	2A(1)	2A(2)	2B	2C	2C(S)	3
Vacancies	180	180	180	52	105	55	30
Applied	0	0	0	0	50	25	0
Taken	61	0	15	0	50	25	0
Taken Rate	0%	0%	0%	0%	48%	45%	0%

2014

Historical ballot data

Vacancies

180

Applied Rate

56%

Taken Rate

97%

Highest Demand

2C(S)

Metric	Phase 1	2A(1)	2A(2)	2B	2C	2C(S)	3
Vacancies	180	180	180	53	107	39	6
Applied	0	0	0	0	68	33	0
Taken	58	0	16	0	67	33	0
Taken Rate	0%	0%	0%	0%	64%	85%	0%

2013

Historical ballot data

Vacancies

180

Applied Rate

47%

Taken Rate

80%

Highest Demand

Metric	Phase 1	2A(1)	2A(2)	2B	2C	2C(S)	3
Vacancies	180	180	180	64	127	62	36
Applied	0	0	0	0	65	20	0
Taken	49	0	4	0	65	26	0
Taken Rate	0%	0%	0%	0%	51%	32%	0%

2012

Historical ballot data

Vacancies

180

Applied Rate

58%

Taken Rate

96%

Highest Demand

Metric	Phase 1	2A(1)	2A(2)	2B	2C	2C(S)	3
Vacancies	180	180	180	56	111	27	9
Applied	0	0	0	1	85	18	0
Taken	58	0	10	1	85	18	0
Taken Rate	0%	0%	0%	2%	77%	67%	0%

2011

Historical ballot data

Vacancies

180

Applied Rate

61%

Taken Rate

100%

Highest Demand

2C(S)

Metric	Phase 1	2A(1)	2A(2)	2B	2C	2C(S)	3
Vacancies	180	180	180	57	112	44	180
Applied	0	0	0	2	68	40	0
Taken	56	1	9	2	68	44	0
Taken Rate	0%	0%	0%	4%	61%	91%	0%

2010

Historical ballot data

Vacancies

180

Applied Rate

56%

Taken Rate

94%

Highest Demand

2C(S)

Metric	Phase 1	2A(1)	2A(2)	2B	2C	2C(S)	3
Vacancies	180	180	180	56	111	45	9
Applied	0	0	0	0	67	33	0
Taken	62	0	7	0	67	33	0
Taken Rate	0%	0%	0%	0%	60%	73%	0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Peiying Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"hi guys ! i jsut graduated from this school and tbh? i miss it so much every time my mind wanders back here! The teachers are amazing shout out to my p6s one mdm haniza , mrs teo , mr chia and ofc miss hee who was my higher chinese teacher and she taught me so much to live laugh learn chinese tysm ! i want to go back and visit . also their food is so nice especially the mac and cheese and everything the facilities and everything i never treasured them but now i miss them . Also mr matthew best pe teacher hands downn and to all p6s this yr i wish yall best of luck and treasure ur time there!"

Jungeun

April 26, 2025

"It was a very good school when I was a student. At the time I thought I didn't like it but looking back, it was very good."

Sulimir Majewski

April 13, 2025

"It was good but as a student there, I feel like the teachers should let us to the toilet more often:) Also I like the personality of the students there"

Lok

April 11, 2025

"this school best i love spicy noodle there. only problem is teachers vv scrict always scold me"

majestic ballsack

November 20, 2024

"My twins have been in PYPS for the past 5 years. The teachers are all very caring and encouraging. They have a holistic academic and CCAs. Weaker students are highly supported through the different programmes and remedial. The school also conducts many outside of the classroom activities for them for an enriching school life. Maybe some improvements might be their water cooler could include room temperature water and classrooms can be cleaner. ☺️ Overall I highly recommend children to come to this school."

F G

May 26, 2024

"I have been to this school and its a really good school i love it and i was a student there last year the teachers are very nice"

Eloise Oh

July 22, 2023

"My real schooling experience...... thanks to all my teachers and friends!!"

Xuan Kumar

December 25, 2021

"I was a student of this school and graduated in 2016. Though like every school in which you'd get stressed out on things, this school gave me a lot of opportunities to try. The teachers there are just wonderful. Firm yet very helpful and caring!"

Akmal Razali

January 31, 2018