South View Primary School, situated in the heart of Choa Chu Kang, is a highly sought-after institution with an application rate of 136%, resulting from 372 applications for 274 available placements. The school has gained recognition for its outstanding performance in the National Primary Games, showcasing the competitive spirit fostered at South View.
Known for its rigorous academic curriculum complemented by vibrant co-curricular activities, the school offers a range of special programs in sports, arts, and STEM, designed to nurture well-rounded students. This high application rate underscores its popularity among parents seeking quality education.
Secure your child's spot at South View, where potential is nurtured.
South View Primary School
Principal:
Miss Ang Mui Khoong
Vice Principals:
Mr Ong Hong Ghee, Ms Goh Jia Li
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Choa Chu Kang MRT Station
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 210 | 66 | 20 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 144 | 191 | 26 | 155 | 0 | 0 | 516 | |
| % Applied | 69% | 289% | 130% | 378% | - | - | - | |
| Taken | 144 | 66 | 20 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 271 | |
| % Taken | 69% | 100% | 100% | 100% | - | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 210 | 88 | 20 | 43 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 123 | 101 | 21 | 127 | 0 | 0 | 372 | |
| % Applied | 59% | 115% | 105% | 295% | 0% | 0% | 138% | |
| Taken | 123 | 88 | 20 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 274 | |
| % Taken | 59% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 210 | 89 | 20 | 40 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 121 | 105 | 34 | 128 | 0 | 0 | 388 | |
| % Applied | 58% | 118% | 170% | 320% | 0% | 0% | 144% | |
| Taken | 121 | 89 | 20 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 58% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 210 | 78 | 20 | 40 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 132 | 95 | 30 | 177 | 0 | 0 | 434 | |
| % Applied | 63% | 122% | 150% | 443% | 0% | 0% | 161% | |
| Taken | 132 | 78 | 20 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 63% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 230 | 114 | 73 | 21 | 20 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 116 | 41 | 79 | 23 | 130 | 0 | 0 | 389 | |
| % Applied | 50% | 36% | 108% | 110% | 650% | 0% | 0% | 144% | |
| Taken | 116 | 41 | 73 | 21 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 271 | |
| % Taken | 50% | 36% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 230 | 100 | 62 | 25 | 26 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 130 | 38 | 52 | 24 | 139 | 0 | 0 | 383 | |
| % Applied | 57% | 38% | 84% | 96% | 535% | 0% | 0% | 142% | |
| Taken | 130 | 38 | 52 | 24 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 57% | 38% | 84% | 96% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 230 | 125 | 104 | 38 | 52 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 105 | 21 | 69 | 23 | 154 | 0 | 0 | 372 | |
| % Applied | 46% | 17% | 66% | 61% | 296% | 0% | 0% | 138% | |
| Taken | 105 | 21 | 69 | 23 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 46% | 17% | 66% | 61% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 20 | 20 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 115 | 0 | 0 | 136 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 105% | 575% | 0% | 0% | 50% | |
| Taken | 127 | 18 | 85 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 47% | 7% | 31% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 39 | 58 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 135 | 0 | 0 | 154 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 49% | 233% | 0% | 0% | 57% | |
| Taken | 104 | 14 | 75 | 19 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 5% | 28% | 49% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 43 | 71 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 135 | 0 | 0 | 149 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 190% | 0% | 0% | 55% | |
| Taken | 104 | 14 | 67 | 14 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 5% | 25% | 33% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 39 | 56 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 107 | 0 | 0 | 133 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 67% | 191% | 0% | 0% | 49% | |
| Taken | 124 | 6 | 62 | 22 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 46% | 2% | 23% | 56% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 36 | 46 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 115 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 75% | 191% | 0% | 0% | 43% | |
| Taken | 120 | 8 | 70 | 26 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 3% | 26% | 72% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 32 | 40 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 85 | 0 | 0 | 109 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 75% | 213% | 0% | 0% | 40% | |
| Taken | 110 | 11 | 85 | 24 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 4% | 31% | 75% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 29 | 39 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 103 | 0 | 0 | 122 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 66% | 264% | 0% | 0% | 45% | |
| Taken | 130 | 8 | 74 | 19 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 48% | 3% | 27% | 66% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 19 | 21 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 102 | 0 | 0 | 119 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 89% | 486% | 0% | 0% | 44% | |
| Taken | 145 | 2 | 85 | 17 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 54% | 1% | 31% | 89% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 300 | 300 | 300 | 33 | 33 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 121 | 0 | 0 | 163 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 127% | 367% | 0% | 0% | 54% | |
| Taken | 157 | 6 | 70 | 34 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 300 | |
| % Taken | 52% | 2% | 23% | 103% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with South View Primary School.
"I think South View Primary School is generally a very good school . It rarely has bullying cases and the teachers there are not bias at all and most of them are understanding,kind and supportive in what we do . But I do have one teacher that has been my form teacher, Ms Shaan for 2 years in p3 and p4 . She helped me score AL1-3 for my eoye . She’s also super supportive and kind . Ms Shaan is also very supportive even if we don’t win . She said at least we got in the finals . She doesn’t have high expectations and gone through a very challenging class but she did not give up on us , she continued trying to teach us .Thank you to all my teachers who taught me a lot of things , even though some things were challenging for me you never gave up on me and continued trying to teach me . I am very grateful !"
January 24, 2025
"I am a student of svps. the teachers there some might be strict, but some are really fun!! Overall a great school. Also one of the review is a lie.. in my 6 years being in this school I've never seen a cockroach. Probably the best school in CCK, highly recommend!"
January 11, 2025
"I'm a student of SV most of the teachers are nice and at the end of the year they let us watch movies and videos.The 2 corners of the boys toilet at level 1 and level 3 are dark and dirty but why did they change the level 1 to a MOE kindergarten?"
November 12, 2024
"Most of the reviews here are by students. If you want to know the reviews, you have to be careful. All of the teachers are good, except for a few extremely bias ones. In order to be liked by all the teachers, you have to be a prefect, if not some of the teachers will treat you badly I have many stories to say but I'm not going to say much"
November 09, 2023
"Mrs See Toh has been my form teacher for 3 years , although she is fierce she teaches English in full detail , I have scored AL2,3 and above because of her teaching , She is very good teacher .Highly Recommended ! Good school !"
December 19, 2022