With a competitive application rate of 109%, Zhenghua Primary School is a popular choice among Singaporean parents for Primary 1 admission. Known for its stellar academics and holistic curriculum, Zhenghua has made noteworthy accomplishments in both education and co-curricular activities.
Located in the heart of Bukit Panjang, the school offers a unique blend of academic rigour and character development programmes. The school's commitment to fostering a nurturing environment for young minds is evident in its robust STEM programmes, which have resulted in numerous awards and recognition.
Zhenghua Primary School's strong demand reflects its outstanding reputation as a launchpad for your child's future.
Zhenghua Primary School
Principal:
Mdm Wong Hian Hwee Constance
Vice Principals:
Mdm Sng Yee Yee, Ms Santhana Mary d/o Poobalan
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
LRT: Fajar Station
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 150 | 67 | 20 | 62 | 12 | 4 | 4 |
| Applied | 83 | 69 | 0 | 50 | 8 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Applied | 55% | 103% | 0% | 81% | 67% | 0% | 5,250% | |
| Taken | 83 | 67 | 0 | 50 | 8 | 0 | 208 | |
| % Taken | 55% | 100% | 0% | 81% | 67% | 0% | 5,200% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 150 | 76 | 26 | 77 | 18 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 74 | 59 | 0 | 60 | 37 | 0 | 230 | |
| % Applied | 49% | 78% | 0% | 78% | 206% | 0% | 110% | |
| Taken | 74 | 59 | 0 | 60 | 18 | 0 | 211 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 78% | 0% | 78% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 150 | 72 | 26 | 76 | 32 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 78 | 55 | 2 | 44 | 44 | 0 | 223 | |
| % Applied | 52% | 76% | 8% | 58% | 138% | 0% | 106% | |
| Taken | 78 | 55 | 2 | 44 | 32 | 0 | 211 | |
| % Taken | 52% | 76% | 8% | 58% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 180 | 89 | 30 | 90 | 23 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 91 | 59 | 0 | 68 | 25 | 0 | 243 | |
| % Applied | 51% | 66% | 0% | 76% | 109% | 0% | 101% | |
| Taken | 91 | 59 | 0 | 68 | 23 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 51% | 66% | 0% | 76% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 200 | 122 | 122 | 63 | 124 | 32 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 78 | 0 | 37 | 1 | 92 | 45 | 0 | 253 | |
| % Applied | 39% | 0% | 30% | 2% | 74% | 141% | 0% | 105% | |
| Taken | 78 | 0 | 37 | 1 | 92 | 32 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 0% | 30% | 2% | 74% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 180 | 101 | 100 | 56 | 111 | 21 | 220 | 220 |
| Applied | 79 | 1 | 29 | 1 | 92 | 23 | 0 | 225 | |
| % Applied | 44% | 1% | 29% | 2% | 83% | 110% | 0% | 102% | |
| Taken | 79 | 1 | 29 | 1 | 92 | 21 | 0 | 223 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 1% | 29% | 2% | 83% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 170 | 85 | 85 | 51 | 100 | 24 | 5 | 210 |
| Applied | 85 | 0 | 23 | 2 | 76 | 19 | 0 | 205 | |
| % Applied | 50% | 0% | 27% | 4% | 76% | 79% | 0% | 98% | |
| Taken | 85 | 0 | 23 | 2 | 76 | 19 | 0 | 205 | |
| % Taken | 50% | 0% | 27% | 4% | 76% | 79% | 0% | 98% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 62 | 126 | 65 | 43 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 62 | 22 | 0 | 86 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 49% | 34% | 0% | 36% | |
| Taken | 84 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 61 | 22 | 0 | 199 | |
| % Taken | 35% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 48% | 34% | 0% | 83% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 56 | 113 | 28 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 88 | 28 | 0 | 117 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 78% | 100% | 0% | 56% | |
| Taken | 80 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 85 | 28 | 0 | 211 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 75% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 56 | 112 | 27 | 17 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 85 | 10 | 0 | 96 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 76% | 37% | 0% | 46% | |
| Taken | 84 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 85 | 10 | 0 | 194 | |
| % Taken | 40% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 76% | 37% | 0% | 92% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 53 | 104 | 16 | 14 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 88 | 2 | 0 | 91 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 85% | 13% | 0% | 43% | |
| Taken | 83 | 0 | 22 | 1 | 88 | 2 | 0 | 196 | |
| % Taken | 40% | 0% | 10% | 2% | 85% | 13% | 0% | 93% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 59 | 117 | 24 | 15 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 95 | 9 | 0 | 105 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 81% | 38% | 0% | 44% | |
| Taken | 103 | 0 | 19 | 1 | 93 | 9 | 0 | 225 | |
| % Taken | 43% | 0% | 8% | 2% | 79% | 38% | 0% | 94% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 72 | 143 | 45 | 35 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99 | 10 | 0 | 109 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 69% | 22% | 0% | 45% | |
| Taken | 76 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 99 | 10 | 0 | 206 | |
| % Taken | 32% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 69% | 22% | 0% | 86% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 72 | 143 | 6 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 139 | 20 | 0 | 160 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 97% | 333% | 0% | 59% | |
| Taken | 110 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 138 | 6 | 0 | 271 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 0% | 6% | 1% | 97% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 78 | 154 | 46 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 108 | 87 | 0 | 196 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 70% | 189% | 0% | 73% | |
| Taken | 97 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 108 | 46 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 36% | 0% | 7% | 1% | 70% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 300 | 300 | 300 | 78 | 154 | 53 | 300 | 300 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 101 | 55 | 0 | 157 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 66% | 104% | 0% | 52% | |
| Taken | 129 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 101 | 53 | 0 | 300 | |
| % Taken | 43% | 0% | 5% | 1% | 66% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Zhenghua Primary School.
"BRING ME BACK TO HERE BRO 😭🙏 THE ISH LITERALLY IS SO BIG, THE CANTEEN HAD SO MANY GOOD FOOD + ITS ALSO BIG. THE BOOKSTORE WAS BETTER. AND YOU GET TO WATCH MOVIE WHEN YOUR P6 AT CHILDRENS DAY. THEY ALSO HAVE LOTS OF GOOD STUFF YOU COULD PLAY AND EAT DURING THE RACIAL HARMONY, NATIONAL DAY AND ALL SORTS OF STUFF. ALSO HAVE PLAYGROUND THERE 😭"
November 13, 2024
"If I could rate it ZERO stars I WOULD the students at this school are extremely rude I came to visit and the way the students were so unbehaved like do NOT get your children to come here if you want them to turn out like children with no values at ALL"
October 23, 2024
"I go there for cdac tuition the school is ok and all but the problem is the school nature. It has many mosquitoes around plants and all. My sister was waiting for me outside the school gate before tuition ends and she ended up with 7 mosquito bites I'm not being bias because I myself experienced it before too."
July 06, 2024
"I saw a video online of a P6 boy (now secondary 1) from your school doing a dropkick on graduation day. The boy is from 6 Excellence."
August 08, 2024
"This school is great! It has great teachers and I make lots of friends! This school deserves a 5 star!"
April 11, 2024
"honestly,I MADE LOTS OF FRIENDS THERE AND THERE ITS LOTS OF EVENTS,THIS SCHOOL DESERVES BETTER"
April 15, 2025